Hasiera »   Erreportajeak »   Iruzurraren zientzia

Fraud Science

• Zabaldu:
• Twitter
• Facebook
• Emaila

Scientists are honest people who, working and researching, seek to obtain discoveries that serve the development of society, answering the questions that human beings have asked and that they do. They are able to give up everything, including basic physical and psychological needs. This kind of belief is widespread in society, but woe! News Belief is half corrupt; the scientist is a normal, virtuous and defective person who can fall into the clutches of fraud.

7,000 American scientists recently received an unnamed survey. They were asked if they had ever performed an unacceptable attitude or action. 3,000 of the 7,000 surveys received by respondents. The result was as follows: 1.5% acknowledged having ever falsified data or plagiarism. It is not so much, and from there it can be deduced, well thought out, that scientists are quite honest. But there is more data, 33% of scientists acknowledged that they committed worse misdeeds: 15.5%, unable to withstand the pressure of the sponsors, adapted the methodology or results of the investigation; 12.5% accepted erroneous data from others; and 7.6% recognized more fellows, such as the unauthorized use of ideas from others or the use for the benefit of confidential information.

Several examples

It is difficult to determine when fraud begins in science. Think, it is not easy to determine when science itself begins. For setting a date, XVII. The 20th century can be considered the starting point of modern science, when the methods of inductive reasoning were introduced. Until then, speculation was more science than science. However, there were no great revolutions either. XIX. Until the middle of the 20th century science had great technological limitations and had not many possibilities of trials. Revolution XIX. It happened in the last years of the century, when trial assessments and data-based reports became methods. If fraud is rejection of the scientific method, it seems appropriate that date, but it is logical to think that it already existed before.

From then until today the examples are abundant, some of them truly famous in their time and in the following years until becoming theoretical lines. This happened last year with the German anthropologist Reiner Prosch. Reiner Protsch was known for having discovered the skull of a 36,000-year-old human around Hamburg. In the 1980s this news shocked anthropologists around the world, convinced that they were in the eyes of the union between modern man and Neanderthal.

Protsch claimed that for thousands of years the man of Neanderthal, a neighbor of Europe, and the newly arrived Homo sapiens of Africa, lived together at some point. Moreover, between them they had descendants. It is now discovered that the 36,000 year old skull discovered by Protsch was only 7,000 years old. The committee investigating the fraud has claimed that Protsch had never conducted carbon 14 dating tests and had repeatedly presented false fossils with the sole intention of achieving world fame. It will partly fulfill its dream, it will enter the history of anthropology, but by fraud.

The discovery of German fulfilled the theory of the missing link, that is, it proposed another step in the theory of human evolution. Although much of the scientific community did not recognize it, the theory put on the table a novel contribution. And now, when it is proven to be a fraud, it turns the link theory upside down

its scope and all subsequent work. It will be necessary to review these works to see to what extent this theory conditioned.

However, the most striking fraud in anthropology is that of the man of Piltdown, a fraud on account of Darwin's theory of evolution. In 1912, in the Geological Society of London, paleontologists Charles Dawson and Smith Woodward presented a great discovery: the missing link between monkey and man, the skull of an unknown species until then. The fraud lasted 45 years. In 1953 it was discovered that the skeleton was made with human bones and animals. The work had to be excellent, as during the time mentioned experts from around the world investigated the discovery of the village of Piltdown.

Of course, the sciences that investigate the past are not the only ones that have fallen into fraud. All sciences have a hidden history. In physics, for example, the prediction of cold fusion was very popular. In 1990, two US researchers, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, declared finding a cheap and clean nuclear power production system: cold fusion. Faced with the fear of losing the advantages of the fatherhood of the invention, they did not publish any article.

Later it was known that the journal Nature had denied the publication of the article before its announcement because "there was not enough data about the sessions". The results of these sessions have never been replicated in laboratories.

But do not think that the control systems of prestigious journals always work. On more than one occasion they have deceived prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet, PNAS, Science and, of course, others less prestigious. Physicist Jan Hendrik may be the most prominent, since in the aforementioned publication he published more than 80 articles, many of them with false data. The name of the British researcher Andred Wakefield also became known when he published an article in The Lancet that showed that the MMR vaccine – against measles, breeding and rubella – could cause autism. The fraud in this case had direct consequences.

Following the publication of the article in The Lancet, the authors of the alleged study held a public press conference in which the topic had a great impact on the media. As a result, many children have not received the vaccine and since then, measles outbreaks have taken place in Britain several times. The fraud was serious, as scammers received money for fraud. It seems that the intention of the fraudsters was to denounce the laboratories producing the vaccine and take money from them. Apparently, the control of larger journals is not as rigorous as expected.

Fraud anywhere

Another characteristic of fraud would be the lack of citizenship. Grab the ball of the world, start spinning and place your finger at any point. Explore the history of local science and discover fraud, also in Euskal Herria. Perhaps the most prestigious is that of prehistoric paintings.

In 1991, a student named Serafin Ruiz discovered a painting in the cave of Zubialde in Gorbeia. He looked little, made spectacular paintings (20 figures and 50 rare signs) and announced his discovery. The work was brilliant, it seemed to the real eye, but finding traces of esparto in the exams they knew that the author of the paintings was Serafín himself. Although experts asked for discretion in the face of the discoveries, then politicians spread the news to the four winds.

By the thread of the story, fraud can be considered a situation or event of the past, but it is not so. Scientists who manage to clone man, the discovery that will reveal the origin of life, cancer vaccines or miraculous treatments, the vital traces found on other planets, the discoveries of new chemical elements, etc. are things that can be read, heard or seen almost daily. In some way, they are facts that respond to what we human beings want to hear and what we expect. Fortunately, scientists who work honestly on that path are more than fraudsters. News